You don’t lose clients because of bad strategy. You lose them because the numbers stop making sense.
Before you scale spend, launch lifecycle programs, or commit to aggressive growth targets, you need to know whether your or your client’s tech stack can actually support the strategy you’re selling.
This checklist is a fast diagnostic to help you tell the difference between a healthy, scalable data foundation and a “Frankenstack”, a collection of tools that technically work, but quietly leak, distort, or misattribute data every day.
Be strict when you answer. If you’re unsure, that’s already a signal. Strategy only scales when the infrastructure underneath it can be trusted.
Diagnostic Tool: Are you scaling a strategy? Or a “Frankenstack”?
INSTRUCTIONS: Audit your or your client’s current tech stack against the 12 pillars of data integrity
below.
- Check YES only if you are 100% certain the system works this way today.
- Check UNSURE if you have to ask someone else or log in to verify.
- Check NO if you know the connection is broken or missing.
SECTION 1: FINANCIAL INTEGRITY (The Truth)
1. Revenue Parity Ad platforms, ecommerce platforms, and the CRM report the exact same revenue for the same time period.
- [ ] YES
- [ ] NO / UNSURE
The Risk: If Meta says you made $10k but the bank says $8k, you are overspending on ads based on false signals.
2. Single Source of Truth One system defines Revenue, CAC, LTV, and Churn. Everyone (Sales, Marketing, Finance) references this same number.
- [ ] YES
- [ ] NO / UNSURE
The Risk: If departments have different KPIs, you are fighting internal battles rather than the market.
3. Automated Reporting Dashboards update automatically via API. No manual CSV exports, no copy-paste work, no fragile spreadsheet formulas.
- [ ] YES
- [ ] NO / UNSURE
The Risk: Manual reporting introduces human error and wastes high-value agency hours on data entry
SECTION 2: SIGNAL & TRACKING (The Engine)
4. Server-Side Tracking Conversions are tracked via API (CAPI), not just the browser pixel.
You are protected against cookie loss and ad blockers.
- [ ] YES
- [ ] NO / UNSURE
The Risk: Reliance on browser-only pixels loses up to 30% of attribution data instantly
5. Offline Conversions Loop Closed deals and qualified leads are fed back into Meta/Google/TikTok APIs to train the bidding algorithms.
- [ ] YES
- [ ] NO / UNSURE
The Risk: If ad networks don’t know who actually bought, they can’t find more people like them.
6. Event Naming Standards Events are clearly named and documented (e.g.,”Purchase_Completed” vs “bought_item”). No duplicates or vague labels.
- [ ] YES
- [ ] NO / UNSURE
The Risk: Messy data makes historical analysis impossible and breaks automation triggers.
SECTION 3: AUTOMATION & FLOW (The Nervous System)
7. Bi-Directional Data Flow CRM status, support tickets, and product usage feed back into marketing tools. (e.g., Ads stop automatically when a support ticket is open).
- [ ] YES
- [ ] NO / UNSURE
The Risk: Marketing to angry customers or churned users increases refund rates and damages brand reputation.
8. Behavior-Based Lifecycle Email/SMS triggers are based on real behavior (usage, churn risk, purchases), not just “page views” or “time delay.”
- [ ] YES
- [ ] NO / UNSURE
The Risk: Generic time-based emails get marked as spam. Behavioral emails get read.
9. Active API Maintenance No expired tokens, abandoned middleware (Zapier/Make), or silent sync failures. Everything is actively monitored.
- [ ] YES
- [ ] NO / UNSURE
The Risk: Silent failures mean you might lose weeks of leads before anyone notices.
SECTION 4: GOVERNANCE (The Control)
10. Attribution Logic Documented Everyone uses the same rules for conversion credit (First touch vs Last touch). No debates in reporting meetings.
- [ ] YES
- [ ] NO / UNSURE
The Risk: If you can’t agree on what caused the sale, you can’t confidently scale the budget.
11. New Tool Impact Review No tool is added to the stack without mapping exactly how data will flow in and out of it first.
- [ ] YES
- [ ] NO / UNSURE
The Risk: “Shadow IT” creates data silos that break your single source of truth.
12. The “Named Owner” One specific person is named responsible for stack uptime and data quality.
- [ ] YES
- [ ] NO / UNSURE
The Risk: If everyone is responsible, no one is responsible.
THE SCORECARD
Count your “NO” and “UNSURE” checkmarks.
[ ] 0 – 2 Checkmarks: Healthy Stack.
Your client is in good shape. Minor tweaks might be needed, but the foundation is solid.
[ ] 3 – 5 Checkmarks: The “Frankenstack” Danger Zone.
Data is leaking. Reporting is likely inaccurate. You are manually patching holes that technology should handle automatically.
[ ] 6+ Checkmarks: Critical Data Failure.
Your strategy is being undermined by broken tech. You are likely flying blind on ROAS and attribution. Immediate audit required.
WHAT NEXT?
Option 1: Fix it Yourself (DIY) Use the checklist above or
Download the PDF here.
Option 2: Let us do the deep dive. We will verify all 12 points for you and hand you a roadmap to fix the red flags.




